On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:08:12 +0100
Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:52:54PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:

quoted

From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Use generic_cmpxchg_local() for arch_cmpxchg_local() implementation
in SH architecture because it does not implement arch_cmpxchg_local().

I do not think this is correct.

The implementation in <asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h> is UP-only (and it only
disables interrupts), whereas arch/sh can be built SMP. We should probably add
some guards into <asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h> for that as we have in
<asm-generic/cmpxchg.h>.

Isn't cmpxchg_local for the data which only needs to ensure to do cmpxchg
on local CPU?

So I think it doesn't care about the other CPUs (IOW, it should not touched by
other CPUs), so it only considers UP case. E.g. on x86, arch_cmpxchg_local() is
defined as raw "cmpxchg" without lock prefix.

#define __cmpxchg_local(ptr, old, new, size)                            \
        __raw_cmpxchg((ptr), (old), (new), (size), "")


Thank you,

I think the right thing to do here is to define arch_cmpxchg_local() in terms
of arch_cmpxchg(), i.e. at the bottom of arch/sh's <asm/cmpxchg.h> add:

#define arch_cmpxchg_local              arch_cmpxchg

Mark.

quoted

Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310241310.Ir5uukOG-lkp@intel.com/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 288f6f38d98f..e920e61fb817 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h

@@ -71,4 +71,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void * ptr, unsigned long old,
 				    (unsigned long)_n_, sizeof(*(ptr))); \
   })
 
+#include <asm-generic/cmpxchg-local.h>
+
 #endif /* __ASM_SH_CMPXCHG_H */

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]