On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:34:18PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 12:30 AM Mike Rapoport [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[...]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/module.c b/arch/s390/kernel/module.c
index 42215f9404af..db5561d0c233 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/module.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/moduleloader.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/memory.h>
+#include <linux/execmem.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
#include <asm/facility.h>
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
void module_arch_cleanup(struct module *mod)
{
- module_memfree(mod->arch.trampolines_start);
+ execmem_free(mod->arch.trampolines_start);
}
#endif
@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@ static int module_alloc_ftrace_hotpatch_trampolines(struct module *me,
size = FTRACE_HOTPATCH_TRAMPOLINES_SIZE(s->sh_size);
numpages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE);
- start = module_alloc(numpages * PAGE_SIZE);
+ start = execmem_text_alloc(EXECMEM_FTRACE, numpages * PAGE_SIZE);
This should be EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT?
This is an ftrace trampoline, so I think it should be FTRACE type of
allocation.
Thanks,
Song
quoted
if (!start)
return -ENOMEM;
set_memory_rox((unsigned long)start, numpages);
[...]
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.