On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:45:23 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 16:12:39 +0800
Chuang Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+
+#define for_each_trace_eprobe_on_trace_probe(ep, _tp) \
+	list_for_each_entry(ep, trace_probe_probe_list(_tp), tp.list)
+

As I replied to the other patch, but after this one was sent (sorry, I was
hyperfocused on my work the last couple of days and was not reading email,
so my INBOX is a bit full). I really hate the verbosity of that name.

At a minimum, let's call it:

  for_each_trace_point_eprobe()

OK, what about "for_each_trace_eprobe_on()"? I would like to clarify

- what type is returned
- not all trace_eprobes, but only on the trace_probe.

Thank you,

-- Steve

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]