Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions
From: Vincent Donnefort <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-03 10:34:10
Also in:
lkml
[...]
quoted
And on the kernel side, just a function to update the "writer fields" of the meta-page: static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work) { struct rb_irq_work *rbwork = container_of(work, struct rb_irq_work, work); + struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer = + container_of(rbwork, struct ring_buffer_per_cpu, irq_work); + + rb_update_meta_page(cpu_buffer); wake_up_all(&rbwork->waiters); That would rate limit the number of updates to the meta-page without any irq storm?Is poll an issue? It requires user space to do a system call to see if there's more data? But I guess that's not too much of an issue, as it needs to do the ioctl to get the reader page.
I don't think there's any problem with this approach, beside the extra system call...
We could also add an option to the ioctl to block, or have the ioctl honor the NON_BLOCK flags of the fd?
... but indeed, we could block there. The userspace interface would be even simpler.
How about?
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -8499,12 +8499,22 @@ static long tracing_buffers_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
{
struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = file->private_data;
struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
+ int err;
+
+ if (cmd == TRACE_MMAP_IOCTL_GET_READER_PAGE) {
+ if (!(file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)) {
+ err = ring_buffer_wait(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
+ iter->cpu_file,
+ iter->tr->buffer_percent);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
- if (cmd == TRACE_MMAP_IOCTL_GET_READER_PAGE)
return ring_buffer_map_get_reader_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
iter->cpu_file);
-- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.