Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] sched, tracing: reorganize fields of switch event struct
From: Ze Gao <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-03 02:02:25
Also in:
linux-perf-users, lkml
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:05 PM Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:09:59 -0400 Ze Gao [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Ze Gao <redacted> Report priorities in 'short' and prev_state in 'int' to save some buffer space. And also reorder the fields so that we take struct alignment into consideration to make the record compact. Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <redacted> --- include/trace/events/sched.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h index fbb99a61f714..7d34db20b2c6 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/sched.h +++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(sched_wakeup_template, sched_wakeup_new, TP_ARGS(p)); #ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS -static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(bool preempt, +static inline int __trace_sched_switch_state(bool preempt, unsigned int prev_state, struct task_struct *p) {@@ -229,23 +229,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch, TP_ARGS(preempt, prev, next, prev_state), TP_STRUCT__entry( - __array( char, prev_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN ) __field( pid_t, prev_pid ) - __field( int, prev_prio ) - __field( long, prev_state ) - __array( char, next_comm, TASK_COMM_LEN ) __field( pid_t, next_pid ) - __field( int, next_prio ) + __field( short, prev_prio ) + __field( short, next_prio ) + __field( int, prev_state )I was talking with Peter on IRC and since the biggest number that prev_state can be is TASK_REPORT_MASK which is 0x100, I think we can make prev_state into a short as well.
Make sense, let's change it to short. Regards, Ze