Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] bpf/btf: Add a function to search a member of a struct/union
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-02 19:48:35
Also in:
bpf, lkml
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-02 19:48:35
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:38 AM Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:24:12 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This is a non starter. bpf progs expect arch dependent 'struct pt_regs *' and we cannot change that.If the progs are compiled into native code, isn't there optimizations that could be done? That is, if ftrace_regs is available, and the bpf program is just using the subset of pt_regs, is it possible that it could be compiled to use ftrace_regs? Forgive my ignorance on how BPF programs turn into executables when running in the kernel.
Right. It's possible for the verifier to do an offset rewrite, forbid certain access, always return 0 on load from certain offset, and so on. It's all non trivial amount of work. ftrace_partial_regs() from ftrace_regs into pt_regs is so much simpler.