Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Remove unnecessary copying of tr->current_trace
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-07-14 08:38:33
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:46:26 -0400 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> I have no idea why the iterator had to allocate a descriptor to make a copy of "current_trace" (now "tr->current_trace"). The content of that pointer never changes, so it's sufficient to just copy the pointer to maintain integrity with reading it. This is more of a clean up than a fix.
Interesting bug. Anyway looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> Thank you,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: d7350c3f45694 ("tracing/core: make the read callbacks reentrants") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 22 +++------------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index be847d45d81c..1c370ffbe062 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c@@ -4205,15 +4205,9 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) loff_t l = 0; int cpu; - /* - * copy the tracer to avoid using a global lock all around. - * iter->trace is a copy of current_trace, the pointer to the - * name may be used instead of a strcmp(), as iter->trace->name - * will point to the same string as current_trace->name. - */ mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock); - if (unlikely(tr->current_trace && iter->trace->name != tr->current_trace->name)) - *iter->trace = *tr->current_trace; + if (unlikely(tr->current_trace != iter->trace)) + iter->trace = tr->current_trace; mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock); #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE@@ -4862,16 +4856,8 @@ __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot) iter->fmt = NULL; iter->fmt_size = 0; - /* - * We make a copy of the current tracer to avoid concurrent - * changes on it while we are reading. - */ mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock); - iter->trace = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter->trace), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!iter->trace) - goto fail; - - *iter->trace = *tr->current_trace; + iter->trace = tr->current_trace; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&iter->started, GFP_KERNEL)) goto fail;@@ -4936,7 +4922,6 @@ __tracing_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, bool snapshot) fail: mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock); - kfree(iter->trace); kfree(iter->temp); kfree(iter->buffer_iter); release:@@ -5021,7 +5006,6 @@ static int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) free_cpumask_var(iter->started); kfree(iter->fmt); kfree(iter->temp); - kfree(iter->trace); kfree(iter->buffer_iter); seq_release_private(inode, file);-- 2.40.1
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]