Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] tracing: introducing eventfs
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-06-22 03:31:50
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:42:24 +0000 Ajay Kaher [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 20-Jun-2023, at 8:32 PM, Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote: !! External Email On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 05:38:25 +0000 Ajay Kaher [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
# of passed: 65 # of failed: 3Unrelated to your patches, but have you checked why these fail? Do you have the latest tests running on the latest kernel?Failed test got passed after enabling /proc/kallsyms, using: echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
Oh, interesting. It should be 'unresolved' (skipped) if that happens. [23] event filter function - test event filtering on functions [FAIL] [60] Kprobe events - probe points [FAIL] [106] (instance) event filter function - test event filtering on functions [FAIL] OK, let me see. Thanks for reporting!
Following is the report of ftracetest on Linux v6.4.0-rc7 (with/without eventfs): # of passed: 68 # of failed: 0 # of unresolved: 6 # of untested: 0 # of unsupported: 45 # of xfailed: 0 # of undefined(test bug): 0 If lockdep is enabled getting same warning as reported by 'kernel test robot' for v3 09/10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/1686640004-47546-1-git-send-email-akaher@vmware.com/ (local)quoted
quoted
# of unresolved: 6 # of untested: 0 # of unsupported: 44 # of xfailed: 0 # of undefined(test bug): 0 These results are same with/without eventfs.I'm hoping to look at these patches this week.Yes, please. Thanks. -Ajay
-- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) [off-list ref]