Today, it is no longer a problem if an inlined function is not inlined and
is traced. Removing notrace from inline has been requested several times
over the years. I believe it is now safe to do so.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/linux/compiler_types.h | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
index 547ea1ff806e..c8f23ba1c339 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h

@@ -182,9 +182,8 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data {
  * externally visible function. This makes extern inline behave as per gnu89
  * semantics rather than c99. This prevents multiple symbol definition errors
  * of extern inline functions at link time.
- * A lot of inline functions can cause havoc with function tracing.
  */
-#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused notrace
+#define inline inline __gnu_inline __inline_maybe_unused