Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2023-05-22

Re: [PATCH] racing/user_events: Prevent same address and bit per process

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2023-05-22 14:32:35
Also in: lkml

Is the subject a Freudian slip?

Added Beau. I need to add him to the maintainers file for user events ;-)

On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:10:35 +0800
sunliming [off-list ref] wrote:
User processes register name_args for events. If the same name are registered
multiple times in the same process, it can cause undefined behavior. Because
the same name may be used for a diffrent event. If this event has the same
format as the original event, it is impossible to distinguish the trace output
of these two events. If the event has a different format from the original event,
the trace output of the new event is incorrect.

Return EADDRINUSE back to the user process if the same event has being registered
in the same process.
I'll let Beau ack this or not.

-- Steve
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: sunliming <redacted>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
index b1ecd7677642..4ef6bdb5c07c 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
@@ -1996,7 +1996,7 @@ static int user_events_ref_add(struct user_event_file_info *info,
 
 		for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
 			if (refs->events[i] == user)
-				return i;
+				return -EADDRINUSE;
 	}
 
 	size = struct_size(refs, events, count + 1);
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help