Re: [PATCH] tracing/user_events: Run BPF program if attached

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 5:14 PM Beau Belgrave [off-list ref] wrote:

Do you run with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP? It will not splat with just
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, which bit me here. I'm now
running all three now that I know better.

I wonder if we should just make PROVE_LOCKING select DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP..

PROVE_LOCKING is the expensive and complicated one. In contrast,
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is the "we've had this simplistic check for some
very basic requirements for a long time".

So DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is really just a minimal debugging thing, it
feels a bit silly to have all the expensive "prove locking with
lockdep and all our lock debugging", and then not test the trivial
basics.

           Linus