Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] riscv: ftrace: Add ftrace_graph_func
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-05-11 07:09:23
Also in:
linux-riscv, lkml
Song Shuai [off-list ref] writes:
Here implements ftrace_graph_func as the function graph tracing function with FTRACE_WITH_REGS defined. function_graph_func gets the point of the parent IP and the frame pointer from fregs and call prepare_ftrace_return for function graph tracing. If FTRACE_WITH_REGS isn't defined, the enable/disable helpers of ftrace_graph_[regs]_call are revised for serving only ftrace_graph_call in the !FTRACE_WITH_REGS version ftrace_caller. Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <redacted> Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
[...]
+ + // always save the ABI regs + + REG_S x10, PT_A0(sp) + REG_S x11, PT_A1(sp) + REG_S x12, PT_A2(sp) + REG_S x13, PT_A3(sp) + REG_S x14, PT_A4(sp) + REG_S x15, PT_A5(sp) + REG_S x16, PT_A6(sp) + REG_S x17, PT_A7(sp)
Really a nit/more general comment; the RISC-V assembly files is a bit all over the place in terms of style; When doing changes, try to prettify it with proper tabs, and maybe we'll have eventual consistency. ;-) No tabs ^^^...
+ + // save the leftover regs + + .if \all == 1 REG_S x2, PT_SP(sp) REG_S x3, PT_GP(sp) REG_S x4, PT_TP(sp) REG_S x5, PT_T0(sp) - save_from_x6_to_x31 + REG_S x6, PT_T1(sp) + REG_S x7, PT_T2(sp) + REG_S x8, PT_S0(sp) + REG_S x9, PT_S1(sp) + REG_S x18, PT_S2(sp) + REG_S x19, PT_S3(sp) + REG_S x20, PT_S4(sp) + REG_S x21, PT_S5(sp) + REG_S x22, PT_S6(sp) + REG_S x23, PT_S7(sp) + REG_S x24, PT_S8(sp) + REG_S x25, PT_S9(sp) + REG_S x26, PT_S10(sp) + REG_S x27, PT_S11(sp) + REG_S x28, PT_T3(sp) + REG_S x29, PT_T4(sp) + REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp) + REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp) + + // save s0 if FP_TEST defined + + .else +#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST + REG_S x8, PT_S0(sp) +#endif + .endif .endm - .macro RESTORE_ALL + .macro RESTORE_ABI_REGS, all=0 + REG_L t0, PT_EPC(sp) REG_L x1, PT_RA(sp) + REG_L x10, PT_A0(sp) + REG_L x11, PT_A1(sp) + REG_L x12, PT_A2(sp) + REG_L x13, PT_A3(sp) + REG_L x14, PT_A4(sp) + REG_L x15, PT_A5(sp) + REG_L x16, PT_A6(sp) + REG_L x17, PT_A7(sp) + + .if \all == 1 REG_L x2, PT_SP(sp) REG_L x3, PT_GP(sp) REG_L x4, PT_TP(sp) - /* Restore t0 with PT_EPC */ - REG_L x5, PT_EPC(sp) - restore_from_x6_to_x31 + REG_L x6, PT_T1(sp) + REG_L x7, PT_T2(sp) + REG_L x8, PT_S0(sp) + REG_L x9, PT_S1(sp) + REG_L x18, PT_S2(sp) + REG_L x19, PT_S3(sp) + REG_L x20, PT_S4(sp) + REG_L x21, PT_S5(sp) + REG_L x22, PT_S6(sp) + REG_L x23, PT_S7(sp) + REG_L x24, PT_S8(sp) + REG_L x25, PT_S9(sp) + REG_L x26, PT_S10(sp) + REG_L x27, PT_S11(sp) + REG_L x28, PT_T3(sp) + REG_L x29, PT_T4(sp) + REG_L x30, PT_T5(sp) + REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp) + .else +#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST + REG_L x8, PT_S0(sp) +#endif + .endif addi sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK .endm + + .macro PREPARE_ARGS + addi a0, t0, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET // ip + la a1, function_trace_op + REG_L a2, 0(a1) // op + mv a1, ra // parent_ip + mv a3, sp // fregs + .endm
...but here...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */ +#ifndef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS ENTRY(ftrace_caller) SAVE_ABI@@ -110,33 +229,28 @@ ftrace_graph_call: jr t0 ENDPROC(ftrace_caller) -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS +#else /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */ ENTRY(ftrace_regs_caller) - SAVE_ALL - - addi a0, t0, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET - la a1, function_trace_op - REG_L a2, 0(a1) - mv a1, ra - mv a3, sp + SAVE_ABI_REGS 1 + PREPARE_ARGS ftrace_regs_call: .global ftrace_regs_call call ftrace_stub -#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER - addi a0, sp, PT_RA - REG_L a1, PT_EPC(sp) - addi a1, a1, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET -#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST - mv a2, s0 -#endif -ftrace_graph_regs_call: - .global ftrace_graph_regs_call + RESTORE_ABI_REGS 1 + jr t0
...and not here. Not a biggie! Nice cleanup! Acked-by: Björn Töpel <redacted>