Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2023-05-21

Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] riscv: ftrace: Add ftrace_graph_func

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-05-11 07:09:23
Also in: linux-riscv, lkml

Song Shuai [off-list ref] writes:
Here implements ftrace_graph_func as the function graph tracing function
with FTRACE_WITH_REGS defined.

function_graph_func gets the point of the parent IP and the frame pointer
from fregs and call prepare_ftrace_return for function graph tracing.

If FTRACE_WITH_REGS isn't defined, the enable/disable helpers of
ftrace_graph_[regs]_call are revised for serving only ftrace_graph_call
in the !FTRACE_WITH_REGS version ftrace_caller.

Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <redacted>
Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
[...]
+
+	// always save the ABI regs
+
+	REG_S x10, PT_A0(sp)
+	REG_S x11, PT_A1(sp)
+	REG_S x12, PT_A2(sp)
+	REG_S x13, PT_A3(sp)
+	REG_S x14, PT_A4(sp)
+	REG_S x15, PT_A5(sp)
+	REG_S x16, PT_A6(sp)
+	REG_S x17, PT_A7(sp)
Really a nit/more general comment; the RISC-V assembly files is a bit
all over the place in terms of style; When doing changes, try to
prettify it with proper tabs, and maybe we'll have eventual
consistency. ;-)

No tabs ^^^...
+
+	// save the leftover regs
+
+	.if \all == 1
 	REG_S x2,  PT_SP(sp)
 	REG_S x3,  PT_GP(sp)
 	REG_S x4,  PT_TP(sp)
 	REG_S x5,  PT_T0(sp)
-	save_from_x6_to_x31
+	REG_S x6,  PT_T1(sp)
+	REG_S x7,  PT_T2(sp)
+	REG_S x8,  PT_S0(sp)
+	REG_S x9,  PT_S1(sp)
+	REG_S x18, PT_S2(sp)
+	REG_S x19, PT_S3(sp)
+	REG_S x20, PT_S4(sp)
+	REG_S x21, PT_S5(sp)
+	REG_S x22, PT_S6(sp)
+	REG_S x23, PT_S7(sp)
+	REG_S x24, PT_S8(sp)
+	REG_S x25, PT_S9(sp)
+	REG_S x26, PT_S10(sp)
+	REG_S x27, PT_S11(sp)
+	REG_S x28, PT_T3(sp)
+	REG_S x29, PT_T4(sp)
+	REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp)
+	REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp)
+
+	// save s0 if FP_TEST defined
+
+	.else
+#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
+	REG_S x8,  PT_S0(sp)
+#endif
+	.endif
 	.endm
 
-	.macro RESTORE_ALL
+	.macro RESTORE_ABI_REGS, all=0
+	REG_L t0,  PT_EPC(sp)
 	REG_L x1,  PT_RA(sp)
+	REG_L x10, PT_A0(sp)
+	REG_L x11, PT_A1(sp)
+	REG_L x12, PT_A2(sp)
+	REG_L x13, PT_A3(sp)
+	REG_L x14, PT_A4(sp)
+	REG_L x15, PT_A5(sp)
+	REG_L x16, PT_A6(sp)
+	REG_L x17, PT_A7(sp)
+
+	.if \all == 1
 	REG_L x2,  PT_SP(sp)
 	REG_L x3,  PT_GP(sp)
 	REG_L x4,  PT_TP(sp)
-	/* Restore t0 with PT_EPC */
-	REG_L x5,  PT_EPC(sp)
-	restore_from_x6_to_x31
+	REG_L x6,  PT_T1(sp)
+	REG_L x7,  PT_T2(sp)
+	REG_L x8,  PT_S0(sp)
+	REG_L x9,  PT_S1(sp)
+	REG_L x18, PT_S2(sp)
+	REG_L x19, PT_S3(sp)
+	REG_L x20, PT_S4(sp)
+	REG_L x21, PT_S5(sp)
+	REG_L x22, PT_S6(sp)
+	REG_L x23, PT_S7(sp)
+	REG_L x24, PT_S8(sp)
+	REG_L x25, PT_S9(sp)
+	REG_L x26, PT_S10(sp)
+	REG_L x27, PT_S11(sp)
+	REG_L x28, PT_T3(sp)
+	REG_L x29, PT_T4(sp)
+	REG_L x30, PT_T5(sp)
+	REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp)
 
+	.else
+#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
+	REG_L x8,  PT_S0(sp)
+#endif
+	.endif
 	addi	sp, sp, PT_SIZE_ON_STACK
 	.endm
+
+	.macro PREPARE_ARGS
+	addi	a0, t0, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET	// ip
+	la	a1, function_trace_op
+	REG_L	a2, 0(a1)			// op
+	mv	a1, ra				// parent_ip
+	mv	a3, sp				// fregs
+	.endm
...but here...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
 ENTRY(ftrace_caller)
 	SAVE_ABI
 
@@ -110,33 +229,28 @@ ftrace_graph_call:
 	jr t0
 ENDPROC(ftrace_caller)
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
+#else /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS */
 ENTRY(ftrace_regs_caller)
-	SAVE_ALL
-
-	addi	a0, t0, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET
-	la	a1, function_trace_op
-	REG_L	a2, 0(a1)
-	mv	a1, ra
-	mv	a3, sp
+	SAVE_ABI_REGS 1
+	PREPARE_ARGS
 
 ftrace_regs_call:
 	.global ftrace_regs_call
 	call	ftrace_stub
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-	addi	a0, sp, PT_RA
-	REG_L	a1, PT_EPC(sp)
-	addi	a1, a1, -FENTRY_RA_OFFSET
-#ifdef HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FP_TEST
-	mv	a2, s0
-#endif
-ftrace_graph_regs_call:
-	.global ftrace_graph_regs_call
+	RESTORE_ABI_REGS 1
+	jr t0
...and not here.

Not a biggie! Nice cleanup!

Acked-by: Björn Töpel <redacted>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help