Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] function_graph: Support recording and printing the return value of function
From: Donglin Peng <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-17 02:50:08
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-riscv, lkml
On 2023/3/17 7:21, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 06:39:10AM -0700, Donglin Peng wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index e24a9820e12f..ad03fc868f34 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ config ARM select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL select HAVE_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER + select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL if HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT if PERF_EVENTS && (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7)diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S index 3e7bcaca5e07..0151d2ce9958 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S@@ -258,6 +258,10 @@ ENDPROC(ftrace_graph_regs_caller) #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER ENTRY(return_to_handler) stmdb sp!, {r0-r3} +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL + /* Pass the function return value to ftrace_return_to_handler */ + mov r1, r0In a similar vein to Peter's comment, do we care about 64-bit return values here, because the above only covers 32-bit values. If we do care about 64-bit values, then we get into EABI/OABI stickyness, because on EABI the 64-bit value would have to be passed in r2,r3, and OABI would need r1,r2. it would be better to have the 64-bit argument as the first argument to ftrace_return_to_handler() which would eliminate that variability, but I don't know what effect that would have for other architectures. Things get more icky if we want 128-bit values. For EABI, we've conveniently just stacked that. For OABI, that would need to be in r1-r3 and the final high bits on the stack. With a 128-bit argument as the first, that would be r0-r3 with the existing stack pointer argument stored... on the stack. So, really it depends what size of return value we want to report. Also, please bear in mind that where a function returns a 32-bit value, that will be in r0, and r1 will be whatever happened to be in it at function exit - there's no defined value for r1.
Thank you. I will document this as a limitation of fgraph return value. It can just cover most cases at present and I think the r0 is enough.