[PATCH v7 7/7] fsi: sbefifo: Don't check status during probe

From
Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
Date
2023-03-03 17:05:11
Also in
linux-devicetree, lkml
Reply to
Eddie James, 2023-03-03
The status check during probe doesn't serve any purpose. Any attempt
to use the SBEFIFO will result in the same check and cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
index 9912b7a6a4b9..42d7c95528d1 100644
--- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
+++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
@@ -1027,14 +1027,6 @@ static int sbefifo_probe(struct device *dev)
 	mutex_init(&sbefifo->lock);
 	sbefifo->timeout_start_rsp_ms = SBEFIFO_TIMEOUT_START_RSP;
 
-	/*
-	 * Try cleaning up the FIFO. If this fails, we still register the
-	 * driver and will try cleaning things up again on the next access.
-	 */
-	rc = sbefifo_cleanup_hw(sbefifo);
-	if (rc && rc != -ESHUTDOWN)
-		dev_err(dev, "Initial HW cleanup failed, will retry later\n");
-
 	/* Create chardev for userspace access */
 	sbefifo->dev.type = &fsi_cdev_type;
 	sbefifo->dev.parent = dev;
-- 
2.31.1
Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, last reply 2023-03-04
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help