Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Check whether clk_round_rate() returns zero rate
From: Chanwoo Choi <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-15 18:31:36
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Chanwoo Choi <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-15 18:31:36
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On 21. 9. 15. 오후 12:51, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi, On 21. 9. 13. 오전 3:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:quoted
EMC clock is always-on and can't be zero. Check whether clk_round_rate() returns zero rate and error out if it does. It can return zero if clock tree isn't initialized properly. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.cb/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c index d83fdc2713ed..65ecf17a36f4 100644--- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c@@ -891,9 +891,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(structplatform_device *pdev) return err; rate = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX); - if (rate < 0) { + if (rate <= 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to round clock rate: %ld\n", rate); - return rate; + return rate ?: -EINVAL;
If rate is 0, It doesn't return and fall-through? even if print the error message. 'return rate ?: -EINVAL;' style is strange for me because it doesn't specify the 'return value' when rate is true. -- Best Regards, Samsung Electronics Chanwoo Choi