15.01.2021 18:22, Thierry Reding пишет:
...

quoted

 static int hda_tegra_first_init(struct azx *chip, struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct hda_tegra *hda = container_of(chip, struct hda_tegra, chip);

@@ -495,7 +441,11 @@ static int hda_tegra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	err = hda_tegra_init_clk(hda);
+	hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda";
+	hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda2hdmi";
+	hda->clocks[hda->nclocks++].id = "hda2codec_2x";

Originally the code did this in this order: "hda", "hda2codec_2x" and
"hda2hdmi". I don't expect the exact order to be very relevant, but was
there any particular reason to change it?

The reason was "to make code look nicer". This was a conscious decision
since indeed the clocks order shouldn't matter for this driver.