Hi Thierry,

On 24/02/20 8:42 pm, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:36:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:

quoted

Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_fuse_readl().
Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to
output a warning that may potentially confuse users.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <redacted>
---
 drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Kishon,

I already have a couple of PHY subsystem patches from JC and Nagarjuna
in a branch in the Tegra tree that I need to resolve a dependency. Do
you mind if I pick this up into that branch as well and send it to you
as a pull request later on? Say around v5.6-rc6?

You can take this via Tegra tree itself.

Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <redacted>

-Kishon

Alternatively you could provide an Acked-by and then I can take them all
through ARM SoC.

Thierry

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c
index 84c27394c181..12d0f3e30dbc 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra186.c

@@ -802,7 +802,9 @@ tegra186_xusb_read_fuse_calibration(struct tegra186_xusb_padctl *padctl)
 
 	err = tegra_fuse_readl(TEGRA_FUSE_SKU_CALIB_0, &value);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n", err);
+		if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to read calibration fuse: %d\n",
+				err);
 		return err;
 	}
 

-- 
2.17.1