Re: [PATCH 5/6] pinctrl: tegra: Add DT binding for io pads control
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Date: 2016-05-03 13:33:35
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml
On 03/05/16 13:54, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 06:14 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:quoted
On 02/05/16 13:17, Laxman Dewangan wrote:quoted
+ +The voltage supported on the pads are 1.8V and 3.3V. The enums are defined as: + For 1.8V, use TEGRA_IO_PAD_POWER_SOURCE_1800000UV + For 3.3V, use TEGRA_IO_PAD_POWER_SOURCE_3300000UVAre these still necessary now that the driver is using uV? Can't we just use integer values for 1800000 and 3300000 in the DTS directly?The config param and value are packed in u32 with 16bit each So we can not make uV in 16bit until we do conversion of uV->mV. Hence suggestion came from Stephen that we can have enum for Nvidia specific and what actually it supports by HW. HW does not support any other voltage.
Ah yes I see.
quoted
quoted
+Required subnode-properties: +========================== +- pins : An array of strings. Each string contains the name of an IO pads. Valid + values for these names are listed below.Please see my previous comments.This is taken from other dt binding docs for description. We can have array of string.
OK.
As all value of pins are not supporting all property and hence I explicitly wrote under properties.
I don't find it very clear. I thought all pins support the low power modes so I think it is clearer to list all the pin names under the pins description.
quoted
quoted
+Optional subnode-properties: +========================== +-nvidia,power-source-voltage: Integer. The voltage level of IO pads. TheI think I prefer nvidia,io-voltage or something. You can describe what this means in this doc. In fact, the current description here does not explicitly state that this voltage, is the voltage the pad is configured to operate at versus the voltage of the IO rail.Linus suggested this dt property name to make more readable and generic and meaningful with other property :power-source.
OK. Jon