On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Thierry Reding
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 04:24:47PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

*_get typically also implies some reference counting which I don't
believe this does. I don't think having 2 functions with completely
different names doing the same thing with only a different calling
convention is good either. So I would keep the old name and the names
aligned.

Okay, I'll make the new function __irq_of_parse_and_map().

I don't know why i detest __prefixing so much but I think it's
really nasty.

Usually this is reserved for compiler- and linker related things,
like __packed;  or __init.

I would prefer irq_of_parse_and_map_strict() or something
like that.

Yours,
Linus Walleij