On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:35:46PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

quoted

So I think this sm0 (and the sm1) entry might actually be
correct; sm0 feeds vdd_core and sm1 feeds vdd_cpu. These rails
have DVFS and hence the voltage can vary. I guess I should change
the regulator-name in these cases to something more useful than
the very first signal name on the schematics too.

Even if they feed these supplies are they capable of varying on
this board if they're shared with other things?  This is one of the
common issues with constraints...  But generally if the supply
covers more than one thing the idiomatic thing is to list them all
separated by / or something.

These two supplies aren't shared, it's just that the signal on the
schematic ends up being named different things in different places; on
the regulator page it's named vdd_sm0, but on some other page it gets
renamed vdd_core.