Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2011-12-20
DORMANTno replies
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 current

Re: [PATCH 0/9] arm/tegra: Various pinmux-related cleanups

From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-20 02:03:43
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:49:57AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote at Saturday, December 17, 2011 5:57 PM:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:12:23PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
While working on switching Tegra to a new pinctrl-based pin mux driver,
I made a bunch of small pinmux-related fixes; this patch series.

This patch series will have a few small context conflicts with Peter
De Schrijver's Tegra30 support. Peter's patch series should have
priority over this one (i.e. be the one merged if it's difficult to
merge both).
Contents of the series as a whole looks good to me, but I did notice a
bunch of section mismatches. Instead of commenting on the specific
ones, just compile with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y and fix up the
new ones and repost, please. :)
Just to close the loop on our IRC conversation, I believe those problems
were introduced by the pinmux rework in Peter's T30 patches rather than
my patch series. In particular, some in:

6996e08 arm/tegra: prepare pinmux code for multiple tegra variants

And some in:

241682c arm/tegra: pinmux tables and definitions for tegra30

Although the latter don't show up until:

44107d8 arm/tegra: implement support for tegra30

Since that actually creates the Kconfig option that allows the T30 pinmux
code to be built.

I'll take a look and come up with a patch for this that can be applied to
Tegra's for-3.3/soc branch.
Yep, sounds good. Applied this series to for-3.3/boards -- thanks!


-Olof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help