Re: [PATCH 0/9] arm/tegra: Various pinmux-related cleanups
From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-20 02:03:43
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:49:57AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote at Saturday, December 17, 2011 5:57 PM:quoted
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:12:23PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
While working on switching Tegra to a new pinctrl-based pin mux driver, I made a bunch of small pinmux-related fixes; this patch series. This patch series will have a few small context conflicts with Peter De Schrijver's Tegra30 support. Peter's patch series should have priority over this one (i.e. be the one merged if it's difficult to merge both).Contents of the series as a whole looks good to me, but I did notice a bunch of section mismatches. Instead of commenting on the specific ones, just compile with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y and fix up the new ones and repost, please. :)Just to close the loop on our IRC conversation, I believe those problems were introduced by the pinmux rework in Peter's T30 patches rather than my patch series. In particular, some in: 6996e08 arm/tegra: prepare pinmux code for multiple tegra variants And some in: 241682c arm/tegra: pinmux tables and definitions for tegra30 Although the latter don't show up until: 44107d8 arm/tegra: implement support for tegra30 Since that actually creates the Kconfig option that allows the T30 pinmux code to be built. I'll take a look and come up with a patch for this that can be applied to Tegra's for-3.3/soc branch.
Yep, sounds good. Applied this series to for-3.3/boards -- thanks! -Olof