On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Peter De Schrijver wrote:

quoted

--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 
 void harmony_pinmux_init(void);
 void seaboard_pinmux_init(void);
-
+void ventana_pinmux_init(void);
 
 struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
        OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", TEGRA_SDMMC1_BASE, "sdhci-tegra.0", NULL),

@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
                harmony_pinmux_init();
        else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,seaboard"))
                seaboard_pinmux_init();
+       else if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,ventana"))
+               ventana_pinmux_init();

Are you (Peter, Colin, Olof) confident that this is not getting out
of hand before it's getting better?

We don't planning to add more derived boards besides ventana until we have the
devicetree bindings for the new pinmux API in at which point this code
will become obsolete.

Cheers,

Peter.