Re: [PATCH v2] staging: r8188eu: use a delayed worker for led updates
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-12-03 14:14:38
Also in:
lkml
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-12-03 14:14:38
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:04:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
This was confusing becuase it should have been [PATCH 4/4 v2]. These days I think the prefered way is to just resend the whole series as a new thread. Greg doesn't use patchwork, but these rules especially apply for subsystems which use patchwork. People say that patchwork gets confused when people use the --in-reply-to option and I guess it's hard to apply individual patches in patchwork? Anyway, just always start a new thread and resend everything. Send a reply to the original thread to say "Don't apply this one, it has sleeping in atomic bugs", otherwise it might get applied by mistake.
I had already reverted that patch from my tree, so I would not have applied it again :) thanks, greg k-h