Re: [PATCH 16/17] [NOT-FOR-MERGE] media: atomsip: pci: add DMI match for Microsoft Surface 3 with broken DMI (OEMB)
From: Tsuchiya Yuto <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-27 14:47:38
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 20:46 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi, On 10/21/21 11:46, Tsuchiya Yuto wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 09:56 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:quoted
Hi, On 10/17/21 18:19, Tsuchiya Yuto wrote:quoted
This commit is added for Surface 3 with broken DMI table. HACK-ish. Not intended for upstreaming. Thus, NOT-FOR-MERGE. But, if someone knows a nicer way to address this, comments are welcome...quoted
8-----------------------------------------------------------------8<On some Microsoft Surface 3, the DMI table gets corrupted for unknown reasons and breaks existing DMI matching used for device-specific quirks. This commit adds the (broken) DMI data into dmi_system_id tables used for quirks so that the driver can enable quirks even on the affected systems. On affected systems, the DMI data will look like this: $ grep . /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/{bios_vendor,board_name,board_vendor,\ chassis_vendor,product_name,sys_vendor} /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/bios_vendor:American Megatrends Inc. /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/board_name:OEMB /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/board_vendor:OEMB /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/chassis_vendor:OEMB /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/product_name:OEMB /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor:OEMBI wonder what the bios_date field contains ? Typically when the DMI strings are no good (e.g. often they contain "Default String" or "To be filled by OEM") we add a check on the bios-date, which together with the broken strings is considered unique enough to still allow a match with broken strings in the kernel.Thank you so much for the comment :-) Here is the full output of "/sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/*" (not showing files that need root permission to read): $ grep . /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/* /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/bios_date:03/09/2015 /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/bios_release:5.6 /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/bios_vendor:American Megatrends Inc. /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/bios_version:1.51116.238Interesting, this is the latest BIOS from july 2019 according to: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/surface-3-update-history-5d86a7bc-03f7-2d27-d858-e90ce637fb52 yet the date is still set to 03/09/2015.
Yeah, I'm a little bit confused about this.
I just checked and the BIOS with not corrupted DMI strings also keeps the date at 03/09/2015 in BIOS updates. So the date is correct, and together with matching a coupleof the OEMB-s (which I've never seen anywhere else either) this should be plenty unique. So this not only allows adding this mathc to atomisp, but also to fix sound + wmi on bad DMI data OEMB Surface 3-s, by updating this patch: https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/blob/2fb7e9ae91350098db9a280277f424272816a9ab/patches/5.5/0003-surface3-oemb.patch To include the BIOS-date match and then submitting this upstream (as 2 separate patches please). Tsuchiya, I take it that your Surface 3 has the OEMB issue, so you can actually test this ?
Yes, my surface3 is also affected and I can test this.
If you can prepare 2 patches for the sound + wmi then; and submit them upstream that would be great. Please Cc me on both patches.
Thank you for the suggestion, but I started having a mixed feeling about
sending this kind of patches... This "OEMB" issue is not a design by
manufacturers, but simply just it got broken after something (maybe a
force power off?). On the other hand, I know there are also indeed some
people affected by this issue other than me...
If possible, I rather want to fix this broken DMI table, but I couldn't
find the way until now though.
But again, thank you for the suggestion. I'll consider sending the
patches when I gave up fixing it...
<Below is completely off topic from atomisp>
I think some useful BIOS option might be just hidden. So, I'd like to
try this way. I already find the string "Restore Defaults" using
uefitool/ifrextract:
0x13429 Form: Save & Exit, FormId: 0x2719 {01 86 19 27 4C 00}
[...]
0x134E0 Suppress If {0A 82}
0x134E2 QuestionId: 0x1C3 equals value 0x5 {12 06 C3 01 05 00}
0x134E8 Ref: Restore Defaults, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0xFFFF, VarStore: 0x0, QuestionId: 0x1BC, FormId: 0x2719 {0F 0F 5B 00 5C 00 BC 01 00 00 FF FF 00 19 27}
0x134F7 End If {29 02}
[...]
I currently don't know how I can call this. I want to try this way when
I have some time...
Regards,
Tsuchiya Yuto