Re: [PATCH 02/14] staging: r8188eu: remove hal_reset_security_engine from struct hal_ops
From: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
Date: 2021-09-06 23:05:33
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 09:26, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:00:54AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:quoted
Remove hal_reset_security_engine function pointer from struct hal_ops, as it is unused. Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk> --- drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h index 5612274dea4d..3cbe6c277677 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/hal_intf.h@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ struct hal_ops { u32 bndy_cnt); void (*hal_notch_filter)(struct adapter *adapter, bool enable); - void (*hal_reset_security_engine)(struct adapter *adapter); c2h_id_filter c2h_id_filter_ccx; };I love these patchsets which are removing the HAL layer, but it would be better if you folded patches 1 and 2 together because it would be easier to review. That way we can just say "Well, if this patch isn't correct it will cause a compile error so let's assume it's correct unless the kbuild-bot complains." There are other pairs in this patchset which are the same way where they would be easier to review if they were merged. 3 & 4. 5 & 6. Etc. The patcheset is fine but for future reference please fold them together. Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted> regards, dan carpenter
Dear Dan, Thank you for the review, much appreciated. I will endeavour to do this in future. Regards, Phil