Re: [PATCH] ANDROID: staging: add userpanic-dev driver
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-08-26 10:01:11
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 05:28:54PM +0800, Woody Lin wrote:
Add char device driver 'userpanic-dev' that exposes an interface to userspace processes to request a system panic with customized panic message.
Some comments on the code now:
obj-$(CONFIG_ASHMEM) += ashmem.o +obj-$(CONFIG_USERPANIC_CHARDEV) += userpanic-dev.o
Why CHARDEV?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/userpanic-dev.c b/drivers/staging/android/userpanic-dev.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b9a0f0c01826 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/staging/android/userpanic-dev.c@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* userpanic-dev.c + * + * User-panic Device Interface + * + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC + */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ":%s: " fmt, __func__
Why is this needed?
+
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
+
+struct userpanic_crash_info {
+ void __user *title_uaddr;
+ void __user *msg_uaddr;
+};If this is a user/kernel api, it can not be burried in a .c file, otherwise it will be wrong over time. And this is NOT how to handle user/kernel pointers at all, please fix.
+
+#define CRASH_INFO (_IOW('U', 179, struct userpanic_crash_info))Why does this have to be an ioctl at all? Why do you have to have a char device for this?
+
+static int do_userpanic(const char *title, const char *msg)
+{
+ const size_t msgbuf_sz = PAGE_SIZE;
+ char *msgbuf;
+
+ msgbuf = kmalloc(msgbuf_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!msgbuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pr_emerg("User process '%.*s' %d requesting kernel panic\n",
+ sizeof(current->comm), current->comm, current->pid);You have a pointer to a struct device, always use it for this and all other messages, it should be dev_*(), right?
+ if (msg)
+ pr_emerg(" with message: %s\n", msg);Multi line messages? Why?
+ + /* Request panic with customized panic title. */ + snprintf(msgbuf, msgbuf_sz, "U: %s: %s", current->comm, title); + panic(msgbuf); + kfree(msgbuf);
Nice, you cleaned up after panicing? Why?
+ return -EFAULT;
+}
+
+static long userpanic_device_ioctl(struct file *file, u_int cmd, u_long arg)
+{
+ struct userpanic_crash_info crash_info;
+ char *title;
+ char *msg = NULL;
+ int ret;
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case CRASH_INFO:
+ if (copy_from_user(&crash_info, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(crash_info)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (!crash_info.title_uaddr)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ title = strndup_user(crash_info.title_uaddr, PAGE_SIZE);What if the string was bigger?
+ if (IS_ERR(title)) {
+ pr_err("failed to strndup .title_uaddr: %d\n", PTR_ERR(title));
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (crash_info.msg_uaddr) {
+ msg = strndup_user(crash_info.msg_uaddr, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (IS_ERR(msg)) {
+ kfree(title);
+ pr_err("failed to strndup .msg_uaddr: %d\n", PTR_ERR(msg));
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ ret = do_userpanic(title, msg);
+ kfree(msg);
+ kfree(title);
+ return ret;This can never be hit, right?
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations userpanic_device_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = userpanic_device_ioctl,
+ .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,No need for the compat ioctl, do it right the first time.
+};
+
+static struct miscdevice userpanic_device = {
+ .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
+ .name = "userspace_panic",
+ .fops = &userpanic_device_fops,
+};
+
+static int __init userspace_panic_dev_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = misc_register(&userpanic_device);
+ if (ret)
+ pr_err("misc_register failed for userspace_panic device\n");
+
+ return ret;
+}Use the correct misc macro here, no need for an init or exit function. Wait, where is your exit function?
+device_initcall(userspace_panic_dev_init);
Why this init call level? Why not the normal one? thanks, greg k-h