Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] staging: vchiq: Move vchiq char driver to its own file
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-05 10:58:21
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml, oe-kbuild-all
Hello Dan, On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 12:56:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hi Ojaswin, url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ojaswin-Mujoo/vchiq-Patch-to-separate-platform-and-cdev-code/20210705-000124 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git 77ad1f0e99bd00af024e650b862cfda3137af660 config: i386-randconfig-m021-20210705 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted> smatch warnings: drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c:1235 vchiq_release() warn: argument 3 to %lx specifier is cast from pointer vim +1235 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1227 static int vchiq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1228 { 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1229 struct vchiq_instance *instance = file->private_data; 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1230 struct vchiq_state *state = vchiq_get_state(); 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1231 struct vchiq_service *service; 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1232 int ret = 0; 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1233 int i; 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1234 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 @1235 vchiq_log_info(vchiq_arm_log_level, "%s: instance=%lx", __func__, 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1236 (unsigned long)instance); This should eventually be converted to %p so it doesn't defeat KASLR. (Not that we really care on raspberry pi, I think?)
Yes, that does seem right, however, this patchset only moves the code from vchiq_arm.c to vchiq_dev.c and I've not really touched any of the existing code itself (Except moving it to a new file which is why it shows up in the patch). Hence, I'm not sure if this fix is in scope of this patchset. (I also have a similar warning by kernel test robot here [1] which and I'm not sure if I need to act upon). Maybe we can look at this in a separate patch? [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/4/138
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1237
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1238 if (!state) {
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1239 ret = -EPERM;
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1240 goto out;
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1241 }
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1242
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1243 /* Ensure videocore is awake to allow termination. */
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1244 vchiq_use_internal(instance->state, NULL, USE_TYPE_VCHIQ);
62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 1245
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.orgThank you for looking into this, Ojaswin