Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove if (true) statement
From: Bryan Brattlof <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-19 13:51:23
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:31:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:25:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:quoted
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 02:44:38PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:quoted
Hi Bryan, On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:45:19PM +0000, Bryan Brattlof wrote:quoted
'if (true) { ... }' will always evaluate to true. Remove it and save a few tabs for somewhere else. Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <redacted> --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 159 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c index 9df4476b2e2d..98b1bec67999 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c@@ -59,112 +59,109 @@ static void update_BCNTIM(struct adapter *padapter)I was wondering why are you using the first patch of a nine patch series as a 'cover letter' of an eight patch patchset. In other words, why putting the In-Reply-To field of all patches subsequent to the first one ponting to the first patch itself as a cover letter, is it a recommened practice?It's fine. It doesn't matter. It's not recommended. I do it normally if I have to send patches in certain order. I never write cover letters because my patches are all independent bug fixes and not new features.Wait, this was just a mistake I think. It's not a cover letter. It's not part of the eight patch series but it probably was intended to be as you suggest. The patches are basically okay. Greg applies patches in the order that he recieves them so it should all apply fine. And if it doesn't Greg will just ask for a resend. No big deal.
Yep this is due to my inexperience with git over email :) I wanted to send the patches in order to avoid conflicts when applying because they deal with the same area of the file, but didn't feel they deserved a cover letter to remove some unused definitions. I was using 'git-series' to manage the patch set which generated an empty cover letter that I didn't send out. I should have known that In-Reply-To would have been set for all the remaining emails. Going forward I'll probably just stick with 'git-send-email' and write a proper cover letter, especially while I'm still getting used to sending patches over email. :) -- ~Bryan
regards, dan carpenter