RE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller

Hi!

On 09.03.21 06:56, Kuldeep Singh wrote:

quoted

Hi Heiko,

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Heiko Schocher <redacted>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:01 AM
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Heiko Schocher <redacted>; Ashish Kumar <redacted>;
Mark Brown [off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref];
Yogesh Gaur [off-list ref]; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry
for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller

Caution: EXT Email

add compatible entry "nxp,imx8mp-fspi" in NXP FlexSPI controller

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <redacted>
---

(no changes since v1)

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt

b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
index 7ac60d9fe3571..fd5f081f6d91b 100644

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
   - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
                            "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
                            "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
+                           "nxp,imx8mp-fspi"

It seems the changes are not on top of tree. Please see[1] for latest changes

including imx8dxl entry.

quoted

Snippet below:

Required properties:
  - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi"
                          "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi"
                          "nxp,imx8mm-fspi"
                          "nxp,imx8dxl-fspi"

My patches are based on mainline..
*   144c79ef33536 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge tag 'perf-tools-fixes-for-
v5.12-2020-03-07'
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux (vor 32 Stunden)
<Linus Torvalds>

Should I post this patch rebased on [1] or may all patches rebased on [1] ?

Hi Heiko,

As per cover letter, I can identify that first two are driver/Documentation patches and other two are device-tree patches.
Device-tree patches(3/4 and 4/4) will go via Shawn tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git)
And initial two driver patches(1/4 and 2/4) will go via Mark's tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git)

One approach I can think of is to send driver patches first and later send device-tree patches mentioning dependency on first two patches.
Maybe Mark can comment here if he has any other opinion.

Thanks
Kuldeep