Re: [PATCH v2 03/45] notifier: Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority()
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-10-28 21:32:58
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-omap, linux-pm, linux-riscv, linux-tegra, linuxppc-dev, lkml, xen-devel
28.10.2021 14:00, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:33AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:quoted
Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return true if given handler has unique priority....quoted
+/** + * atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique + * @nh: Pointer to head of the atomic notifier chain + * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check + * + * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority. + * Must be called in process context. + * + * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise.Why this indentation?
This is the same doc-comment style used by this file in general. I haven't tried to invent anything new.
...quoted
+ /* + * This code gets used during boot-up, when task switching is + * not yet working and interrupts must remain disabled. AtOne space is enough.
This comment is replicated multiple times over this source file. You can find it before each down_write(). I borrowed the text as-is, for consistency.