Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Cleanup MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ

On 2021/9/29 15:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

Hi Kefeng,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:35 AM Kefeng Wang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Most ARCHs support SPARSE_IRQ, the dynamical and statical irq
description allocation are alternative.

The last user of MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is sh/csky, but the sh use
SPARSE_IRQ, MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ could be kill. and for csky, it
uses statical allocation by default.

So MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to be useless, no need to maintain a
separate MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ config, kill it.

Also cleanup the kernel/irq/Kconfig a little.

v2:
- drop all the NR_IRQS suggested by Geert
- don' use SPARSE_IRQ for csky by default, suggested by Guo.

Kefeng Wang (3):
   sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ
   csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
   genirq: Cleanup Kconfig

Thanks for the update!

Tested on SH on landisk (real) and rts7751r2d (qemu), so
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks for your test.

P.S. Please use the same version number in all patches of the series,
      to avoid confusing tools like b4.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210929023522.57732-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/ (local)
2021-09-29  2:35 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang
2021-09-29  2:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] csky: Kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ Kefeng Wang
2021-09-29  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] genirq: Cleanup Kconfig Kefeng Wang
                           ^^

Strange, maybe some unexpected change in my local dir... sorry for the 
confusing.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                         Geert