Re: [PATCH v5 01/22] sh: Add sh-specific early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Date: 2016-07-06 14:50:20
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:53:23PM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2016 11:03:50 +0900, Rich Felker wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:46:21AM +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:quoted
sh used P1 address space in early device tree. So need convert P1 to physical address before reserve memory. Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> --- arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c index 57d45dc..8dbf978 100644 --- a/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c +++ b/arch/sh/boards/of-generic.c@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <linux/clocksource.h> #include <linux/irqchip.h> #include <linux/clk-provider.h> +#include <linux/memblock.h> #include <asm/machvec.h> #include <asm/rtc.h>@@ -203,3 +204,14 @@ static int __init sh_of_device_init(void) return 0; } arch_initcall_sync(sh_of_device_init); + +int __init early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch(phys_addr_t base, + phys_addr_t size, bool nomap) +{ + if (nomap) + return memblock_remove(base, size); + + if (base >= P1SEG) + base &= ~P1SEG; + return memblock_reserve(base, size); +}--I think we need a consistent form of physical memory addressing in the DT that doesn't require this. Hard-coding details of the segmented memory model all over the place does not look like a good idea; it's going to badly break anything with full 32-bit which I believe some SH-4 models had (those with PMB?) and which J3/J4 will almost certainly have.Even 32 bits mode are assigned to the same area now. But lookup PMB more better. It add "#ifdef CONFIG_29BIT". Thanks.
I still don't think there should be any sh-specific code here. Can you explain why you think it's needed with an example including real addresses and how they'd get mapped incorrectly without this patch? Rich