Thread (152 messages) 152 messages, 13 authors, 2016-04-14
STALE3696d
Revisions (3)
  1. v3 [diff vs current]
  2. v3 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 current

[PATCH v3 41/41] s390: more efficient smp barriers

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2016-01-10 14:22:27
Also in: linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-s390, linux-um, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Subsystem: s390 architecture, the rest · Maintainers: Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev, Linus Torvalds

As per: lkml.kernel.org/r/20150921112252.3c2937e1@mschwide
atomics imply a barrier on s390, so s390 should change
smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic to barrier() instead of
smp_mb() and hence should not use the generic versions.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
index 4d26fa4..5c8db3c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ do {									\
 	___p1;								\
 })
 
+#define __smp_mb__before_atomic()	barrier()
+#define __smp_mb__after_atomic()	barrier()
+
 #include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
 
 #endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */
-- 
MST
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help