Hi Geert,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 27 March 2014 21:47:37 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
---
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt index
f61cef74a212..9ccbe50dcec2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Required Properties:
GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flags are supported.
- gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller.
+Optional properties:
+
+ - clocks: Must contain a reference to the functional clock.
+
I would make the property mandatory. Obviously the driver needs to consider it
as optional in order not to break the DT ABI, but the specification should
make it mandatory in order to ensure that all future implementations will
specify the clock.
Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of gpio-ranges
property and the common GPIO bindings used by client devices.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart