Hello.
On 29-01-2014 10:22, Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
[snip]
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static struct of_device_id rcar_gen2_usb_phy_ofmatch[] = {
+ { .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790", },
+ { .compatible = "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy", },
quoted
quoted
Frankly speaking, I don't understand the need for the clearly
duplicate entries.
quoted
Thanks, will look into remove it.
Anyone else have any comments on this?
I would like you to leave it there.
As we know the r8a7790 is an R-Car Gen2 SoC. But there are other R-Car
Gen2 SoCs, such as the r8a7791, they it could plausibly make use of
rcar-gen2-usb-phy until the driver is updated with a usb-phy-r8a7791 entry.
Why not just "update" the driver this way now, may I ask?
WBR, Sergei