Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call()
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-04 17:25:01
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-04 17:25:01
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote:
Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code. Fix this to be consistent. Cc: Kevin Hilman <redacted> Cc: Paul Mundt <redacted> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Len Brown <redacted> Signed-off-by: David Brown <redacted> --- The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would do so on SH as well.
Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly after and then reintroduced today. [1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109 -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.