Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2011-08-05

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Consistent spelling of cpuidle_idle_call()

From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-04 17:25:01
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml

On 08/04/2011 09:24 AM, David Brown wrote:
Commit a0bfa1373859e9d11dc92561a8667588803e42d8 mispells
cpuidle_idle_call() on ARM and SH code.  Fix this to be consistent.

Cc: Kevin Hilman <redacted>
Cc: Paul Mundt <redacted>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Len Brown <redacted>
Signed-off-by: David Brown <redacted>
---
The referenced commit breaks compilation on ARM, and appears it would
do so on SH as well.
Mark Brown sent this patch[1] months ago when this build breakage was
noticed in linux-next. What happened to that patch? It looks like the
patch that introduced the breakage was pulled from linux-next shortly
after and then reintroduced today.

[1]https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/4/109

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help