On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:36:20PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:13:50PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 07:11:26PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:

quoted

This is intended to make it easier to correctly order IRQs.

As suggested by Guennadi Liakhovetski.

Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <redacted>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>

---

Depends on "mmc: sdhi: Make use of per-source irq handlers"
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c   |   12 ++++++------
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-mackerel.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c
index ce5c251..c687f67 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ag5evm.c

@@ -352,15 +352,15 @@ static struct resource sdhi0_resources[] = {
 		.end	= 0xee1000ff,
 		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
 	},
-	[1] = {
+	[1 + SH_MOBILE_SDHI_IRQ_SDCARD] = {
 		.start	= gic_spi(83),
 		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
 	},
-	[2] = {
+	[1 + SH_MOBILE_SDHI_IRQ_CARD_DETECT] = {
 		.start	= gic_spi(84),
 		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
 	},
-	[3] = {
+	[1 + SH_MOBILE_SDHI_IRQ_SDIO] = {
 		.start	= gic_spi(85),
 		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
 	},

how about naming the irqs?

Sorry, I'm not sure what you are asking for.

Sorry, I've turned my brain back on...

I assume you are asking for #defines to give names to 83, 84 and 85.
While I think that sounds reasonable it would not be in
keeping with the rest contents of the platform files in question.
So I am a little reluctant to open that can of worms.