Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: Use fifo in 8250 console driver
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2021-12-21 08:12:21
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 02:02:11PM -0300, Wander Costa wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:45 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 02:17:31PM -0300, wander@redhat.com wrote:quoted
From: Wander Lairson Costa <redacted> Note: I am using a small test app + driver located at [0] for the problem description. serco is a driver whose write function dispatches to the serial controller. sertest is a user-mode app that writes n bytes to the serial console using the serco driver. Recently I got a report of a soft lockup while loading a bunch a scsi_debug devices (> 500). While investigating it, I noticed that the serial console throughput (called by the printk code) is way below the configured speed of 115200 bps in a HP Proliant DL380 Gen9 server. I was expecting something above 10KB/s, but I got 2.5KB/s. I then built a simple driver [0] to isolate the console from the printk code. Here it is: $ time ./sertest -n 2500 /tmp/serco real 0m0.997s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.997s With the help of the function tracer, I then noticed the serial controller was taking around 410us seconds to dispatch one single byte: $ trace-cmd record -p function_graph -g serial8250_console_write \ ./sertest -n 1 /tmp/serco $ trace-cmd report | serial8250_console_write() { 0.384 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(); 1.836 us | io_serial_in(); 1.667 us | io_serial_out(); | uart_console_write() { | serial8250_console_putchar() { | wait_for_xmitr() { 1.870 us | io_serial_in(); 2.238 us | } 1.737 us | io_serial_out(); 4.318 us | } 4.675 us | } | wait_for_xmitr() { 1.635 us | io_serial_in(); | __const_udelay() { 1.125 us | delay_tsc(); 1.429 us | } ... ... ... 1.683 us | io_serial_in(); | __const_udelay() { 1.248 us | delay_tsc(); 1.486 us | } 1.671 us | io_serial_in(); 411.342 us | } In another machine, I measured a throughput of 11.5KB/s, with the serial controller taking between 80-90us to send each byte. That matches the expected throughput for a configuration of 115200 bps. This patch changes the serial8250_console_write to use the 16550 fifo if available. In my artificial benchmark I could get a throughput increase up to 100% in some cases, but in the real case described at the beginning the gain was of about 25%. [0] https://github.com/walac/serial-console-test Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <redacted> --- drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 3 ++ drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h index 6473361525d1..c711bf118cc1 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ struct serial8250_config { #define UART_CAP_MINI BIT(17) /* Mini UART on BCM283X family lacks: * STOP PARITY EPAR SPAR WLEN5 WLEN6 */ +#define UART_CAP_CWFIFO BIT(18) /* Use the UART Fifo in + * serial8250_console_write + */Why do you need a new bit? Why can't you just do this change for all devices that have a fifo? Why would you _not_ want to do this for all devices that have a fifo?The v1 patch [1] didn't have this extra bit. Andy suggested [2] to add it so we only enabled this new code on tested controllers as a precaution. If it doesn't make sense to you, feel free to consider the v1 patch [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029201402.428284-1-wander@redhat.com/ (local) [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75Vf6DjNcPWpE4Dh3SuzUMJbFQjq1UNCkrCa60uw35SpqKg@mail.gmail.com/ (local)
I do like [1] better, but can you fix up the checkpatch issues and resend it: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis #116: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3342: +static void serial8250_console_fifo_write(struct uart_8250_port *up, + const char *s, unsigned int count) CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line #156: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3412: + use_fifo = (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_FIFO) + && port->fifosize > 1 CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line #157: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3413: + && port->fifosize > 1 + && (serial_port_in(port, UART_FCR) & UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO) CHECK: Logical continuations should be on the previous line #163: FILE: drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3419: + */ + && !(up->port.flags & UPF_CONS_FLOW); thanks, greg k-h