On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:58:46PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:

On 21-12-17 17:59:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:48:14PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:

quoted

Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
index fa23c60a01d0..ee37aa125c86 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml

@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart
           - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
+      - items:
+          - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart
+          - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
+          - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart

Why is "- items:" listed twice here?

There are actually 3 "- items:" and there is a "oneOf:" 
that encloses all of these.

Unfortunately, there are special cases within the driver
that forces the devicetree nodes to have a different list of
compatibles for almost each SoC.

Ah.  Can you resend it as it is long-gone from my queue now.

thanks,

greg k-h