Re: [PATCH] serial: meson: make the current driver compatible with S4
From: Neil Armstrong <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-06 10:50:48
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hi, On 06/12/2021 11:02, xianwei.zhao wrote:
quoted hunk
Because S4 UART use a different clock source, the baud rate calculation need to be updated. Reset the UART during initialization to clear previous status. Signed-off-by: xianwei.zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com> --- drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c index efee3935917f..15a992ee6a28 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c@@ -65,9 +65,11 @@ #define AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(c) ((c) & 0xff) /* AML_UART_REG5 bits */ -#define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK 0x7fffff +#define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK GENMASK(22, 0) #define AML_UART_BAUD_USE BIT(23) #define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL BIT(24) +#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_TICK BIT(26) +#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2 BIT(27) #define AML_UART_PORT_NUM 12 #define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET 6@@ -80,6 +82,14 @@ static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver; static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM]; +/* + * struct aml_uart - device data + * @xtal_tick_en: A clock source that calculates baud rates + */ +struct aml_uart {
please change to a better name like meson_uart_data and pass it as data of meson_uart_dt_match
quoted hunk
+ unsigned int xtal_tick_en; +}; + static void meson_uart_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int mctrl) { }@@ -103,7 +113,7 @@ static void meson_uart_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port) u32 val; val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL); - val &= ~AML_UART_TX_INT_EN; + val &= ~AML_UART_TX_EN;
Seems to be a cosmetic change, please split this in a separate patch.
quoted hunk
writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL); }@@ -121,12 +131,12 @@ static void meson_uart_shutdown(struct uart_port *port) unsigned long flags; u32 val; - free_irq(port->irq, port); + devm_free_irq(port->dev, port->irq, port);
Please split this in a separate patch
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL); - val &= ~AML_UART_RX_EN; + val &= ~(AML_UART_RX_EN | AML_UART_TX_EN);
Seems it fixes a bug, split in a separate patch.
quoted hunk
val &= ~(AML_UART_RX_INT_EN | AML_UART_TX_INT_EN); writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);@@ -270,6 +280,7 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port) u32 val; int ret = 0; + meson_uart_reset(port);
Same, split in a separate patch
quoted hunk
val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL); val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR; writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);@@ -285,24 +296,37 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port) val = (AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(1) | AML_UART_XMIT_IRQ(port->fifosize / 2)); writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_MISC); - ret = request_irq(port->irq, meson_uart_interrupt, 0, - port->name, port); + ret = devm_request_irq(port->dev, port->irq, meson_uart_interrupt, + IRQF_SHARED, port->name, port);
Same, split in a separate patch
return ret;
}
static void meson_uart_change_speed(struct uart_port *port, unsigned long baud)
{
+ struct aml_uart *aml_uart_data = port->private_data;
u32 val;
while (!meson_uart_tx_empty(port))
cpu_relax();
+ val = readl_relaxed(port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
+ val &= ~AML_UART_BAUD_MASK;
+
if (port->uartclk == 24000000) {
- val = ((port->uartclk / 3) / baud) - 1;
- val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL;
+ if (aml_uart_data->xtal_tick_en) {
+ val = (port->uartclk / 2 + baud / 2) / baud - 1;
+ val |= (AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL | AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2);This should be triggered by a value in match data with a new compatible.
quoted hunk
+ } else { + val = ((port->uartclk / 3) + baud / 2) / baud - 1; + val &= (~(AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_TICK | + AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2)); + val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL; + } } else { val = ((port->uartclk * 10 / (baud * 4) + 5) / 10) - 1; + val &= (~(AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL | AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_TICK | + AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2)); } val |= AML_UART_BAUD_USE; writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);@@ -715,6 +739,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct resource *res_mem, *res_irq; struct uart_port *port; + struct aml_uart *aml_uart_data; u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */ int ret = 0;@@ -754,6 +779,14 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!port) return -ENOMEM; + aml_uart_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct aml_uart), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!aml_uart_data) + return -ENOMEM; + + of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "xtal_tick_en", + &aml_uart_data->xtal_tick_en);
This property is not documented in the bindings, instead introduce a new compatible for the S4 and pass the "aml_uart" as the meson_uart_dt_match data pointer. And don't forget to submit the bindings change in another separate patch.
quoted hunk
+ /* Use legacy way until all platforms switch to new bindings */ if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "amlogic,meson-uart")) ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks_legacy(pdev, port);@@ -775,6 +808,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) port->x_char = 0; port->ops = &meson_uart_ops; port->fifosize = fifosize; + port->private_data = aml_uart_data; meson_ports[pdev->id] = port; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);base-commit: 3f19fed8d0daed6e0e04b130d203d4333b757901
Thanks, Neil