Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 0/8] dt-bindinds/dts: support i.MX8ULP

Seems there is conflict after Abel's patchset in next tree, I'll rebase.

Thanks,
Peng.

Hi Shawn,

quoted

Subject: [PATCH V5 0/8] dt-bindinds/dts: support i.MX8ULP

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>


V5:
 only fix patch 8/8 "arm64: dts: imx8ulp: Add the basic dts for
imx8ulp evk board"
  - Correct bus-width to 8 for eMMC
  - Drop pinctrl enet which no user
 Drop patch 1/9 in V4, since in merged in linux-next  Add A-b/R-b tag

V4:

https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2021-November/6
960
20.html

I just pick-up Jacky's work, rebase and send out V4 based on Jacky's
V3 patchset.

If you prefer to split the patchset and send single patches, I could
resend one by one.

Note: the V3 has a gpio bindings patch, it has been separated and sent
to gpio list in a single one per Linus requested.

This patchset is to add i.MX8ULP in dt-bindings, introduce basic
i.MX8ULP dtsi and basic evk board support.

The detailed version changes are in each patch.

There is checkpatch error in patch 8, but that is for device tree
macro and we could use use "(xx)".

In V4, the changes are in patch 8, 9 when rebasing to
linux-next/master ,fix build errors after the clk driver in tree and
drop a few nodes that not have bindings.

Tested with CONFIG_CLK_IMX8ULP and CONFIG_PINCTRL_IMX8ULP

enabled.

quoted

V3:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210625011355.3468586-6-ping
.b
ai@nxp.com/T/

Jacky Bai (8):
  dt-bindings: i2c: imx-lpi2c: Add imx8ulp compatible string
  dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: Add imx8ulp compatible string
  dt-bindings: spi: fsl-lpspi: Add imx8ulp compatible string
  dt-bindings: timer: tpm-timer: Add imx8ulp compatible string
  dt-bindings: watchdog: imx7ulp-wdt: Add imx8ulp compatible string
  dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add binding for imx8ulp evk
  arm64: dts: imx8ulp: Add the basic dtsi file for imx8ulp
  arm64: dts: imx8ulp: Add the basic dts for imx8ulp evk board

For the several dt-bindings, patch 3 has been taken by SPI maintainer,

All patches have got R-b or A-b tag.

would you pick others bindings or they should go through subsystem
maintainer's tree?

Thanks,
Peng.

quoted

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |   6 +
 .../bindings/i2c/i2c-imx-lpi2c.yaml           |   4 +-
 .../bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml           |   4 +-
 .../bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml           |  11 +-
 .../bindings/timer/nxp,tpm-timer.yaml         |   6 +-
 .../bindings/watchdog/fsl-imx7ulp-wdt.yaml    |   7 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts |  64 ++
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-pinfunc.h      | 978

++++++++++++++++++

quoted

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi    | 396 +++++++
 10 files changed, 1468 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)  create mode
100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
 create mode 100755 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-pinfunc.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi

--
2.25.1