RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial:sunplus-uart:Add Sunplus SoC UART Driver
From: Hammer Hsieh 謝宏孟 <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-11 09:45:59
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 5:50 PM To: Hammer Hsieh <hammerh0314@gmail.com>; gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-serial@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jirislaby@kernel.org Cc: Tony Huang 黃懷厚 <redacted>; Wells Lu 呂芳騰 [off-list ref]; Hammer Hsieh 謝宏孟 [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial:sunplus-uart:Add Sunplus SoC UART Driver Hi, On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 15:51 +0800, Hammer Hsieh wrote: [...]quoted
+struct sunplus_uart_port { + char name[16]; + struct uart_port uport; + struct sunplus_dma_info *uartdma_rx; + struct sunplus_dma_info *uartdma_tx; + struct clk *clk; + struct reset_control *rstc; + unsigned int pllsys_rate; + struct gpio_desc *rts_gpio; + struct hrtimer rts_check_tx_empty; + struct hrtimer rts_delay_before_send; + struct hrtimer rts_delay_after_send; }; struct sunplus_uart_port +sunplus_uart_ports[UART_NR];Does this have to be a global array? I would expect these to be allocated in the probe function, one at a time.
With console, it uses global array. Such as: /drivers/tty/serial/ar933x_uart.c #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_AR933X_CONSOLE ar933x_uart_port * ar933x_console_port[ ]; With normal use, it should probe once at a time. I will think about how to modify it.
[...]quoted
+static int sunplus_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct resource *res_mem; + struct uart_port *port; + struct clk *clk, *pllsys; + unsigned int pllsys_rate; + int ret, irq; + int idx_offset, idx; + int idx_which_uart; + char peri_name[16]; + + if (pdev->dev.of_node) { + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial"); + if (pdev->id < 0) + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "uart"); + } + + idx_offset = -1; + + if (IS_UARTDMARX_ID(pdev->id)) + idx_offset = 0; + else if (IS_UARTDMATX_ID(pdev->id)) + idx_offset = UART_DMARX_NR; + + /* init txdma or rxdma */ + if (idx_offset >= 0) { + clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);Should this be requested by name? Looking at the binding, this could be UADMA or HWUA?
Yes, it is better requested by name. But , if request by name , I can't probe both dma_tx and dma_rx with one line. I will think about how to modify it.
quoted
+ if (IS_ERR(clk)) + return PTR_ERR(clk); + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk); + if (ret) + return ret;I suggest to move this down after all required resources are available. Otherwise you'll have to either disable the clock in the error paths, or you are left with a running clock if anything below fails.
OK, I will modify it.
quoted
+ if (idx_offset == 0) + idx = idx_offset + pdev->id - ID_BASE_DMARX; + else + idx = idx_offset + pdev->id - ID_BASE_DMATX; + + res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + if (!res_mem) + return -ENODEV; + + sprintf(peri_name, "PERI%d", (idx & 0x01)); + + clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, peri_name); + if (IS_ERR(clk)) + return PTR_ERR(clk); + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);Same as above.
OK, I will modify it.
quoted
+ if (ret) + return ret; + + sunplus_uartdma[idx].addr_phy = + (unsigned long)(res_mem->start); + sunplus_uartdma[idx].membase = + devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res_mem); + + if (IS_ERR(sunplus_uartdma[idx].membase)) + return PTR_ERR(sunplus_uartdma[idx].membase); + + if (IS_UARTDMARX_ID(pdev->id)) { + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + sunplus_uartdma[idx].irq = irq; + } else { + res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,1);quoted
+ if (!res_mem) + return -ENODEV; + + sunplus_uartdma[idx].gdma_membase = + devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res_mem); + + if (IS_ERR(sunplus_uartdma[idx].gdma_membase)) + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "which-uart",&idx_which_uart) != 0) {quoted
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "\"which-uart\" is not assigned."); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (idx_which_uart >= UART_NR) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "\"which-uart\" is not valid."); + return -EINVAL; + } + + sunplus_uartdma[idx].which_uart = idx_which_uart; + + return 0; + } else if (pdev->id < 0 || pdev->id >= UART_NR) + return -EINVAL; + + /* init uart */ + port = &sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].uport; + if (port->membase) + return -EBUSY; + + memset(port, 0, sizeof(*port)); + + res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + if (!res_mem) + return -ENODEV; + + port->dev = &pdev->dev; + port->mapbase = res_mem->start; + + port->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res_mem); + if (IS_ERR(port->membase)) + return PTR_ERR(port->membase); + + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) + return -ENODEV; + + uart_get_rs485_mode(port); + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rts_gpio = + devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "rts", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + port->rs485_config = sunplus_uart_config_rs485; + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rts_check_tx_empty.function = NULL; + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rts_delay_before_send.function = NULL; + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rts_delay_after_send.function = NULL; + if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) + sunplus_uart_rs485_on(port); + + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);Here the same nameless clock as in the loop above is requested again. Should this be UADMA or HWUA?
No, here should be UART clk, each uart didn't use "clock-names" , that's why we use NULL. In dts UART only use clocks=<&clkc UA0> or <&clkc UA1> or <&clkc UA2>. We did not use "clock-names". uart_probe( ) , first init dma , then init uart.
quoted
+ if (IS_ERR(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk)) + return PTR_ERR(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk); + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk); + if (ret) + return ret;Same comment as above. Better to request the reset control before enabling the clock, for example.
OK, I will modify it.
quoted
+ + sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rstc = + devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);Please use devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() instead.
OK, I will modify it.
quoted
+ + if (IS_ERR(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rstc)) + return PTR_ERR(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rstc); + + ret = reset_control_deassert(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rstc); + if (ret) + return ret; + + clk = sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk; + if (IS_ERR(clk))This can't ever be true, the code above already returned in this case.
Indeed, I will modify it.
[...]quoted
+static int sunplus_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { #ifdef +CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME_UART + if (pdev->id != 0) { + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev); + } +#endif + uart_remove_one_port(&sunplus_uart_driver, + &sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].uport); + + if (pdev->id < UART_NR) { + clk_disable_unprepare(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].clk); + reset_control_assert(sunplus_uart_ports[pdev->id].rstc); + }What about the PERI clocks? This seems to leave them enabled.
In case of dma enable, we should consider it. I will modify it.
regards Philipp