Re: [PATCH v3] serial: imx: Suppress false positive sysrq lockdep warning
From: Fabio Estevam <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-01 14:48:56
Subsystem:
the rest, tty layer and serial drivers · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jiri Slaby
Hi Johan, On 01/10/2021 10:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
quoted
@@ -852,15 +853,10 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq,void *dev_id) static irqreturn_t imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id) { struct imx_port *sport = dev_id; - irqreturn_t ret; spin_lock(&sport->port.lock); - ret = __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id); - - spin_unlock(&sport->port.lock);No, no, no. Just replace this unlock with uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq() and do the
This does not work as uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq() needs to be called inside __imx_uart_rxint() prior to tty_flip_buffer_push().
corresponding change in imx_uart_int(). The result is an even smaller diff than what you're currently proposing and without any performance penalty from dropping and reacquiring the lock.
Yes, I can avoid the unnecessary reacquiring of the lock as you suggested:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
index 8b121cd869e9..5e38bf8fb7b8 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id)
continue;
}
- if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx))
+ if (uart_prepare_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx))
continue;
if (unlikely(rx & URXD_ERR)) {@@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id) } out: + uart_unlock_and_check_sysrq(&sport->port); tty_flip_buffer_push(port); return IRQ_HANDLED;
@@ -852,15 +853,10 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id)
static irqreturn_t imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct imx_port *sport = dev_id;
- irqreturn_t ret;
spin_lock(&sport->port.lock);
- ret = __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id);
-
- spin_unlock(&sport->port.lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id);
}
static void imx_uart_clear_rx_errors(struct imx_port *sport);@@ -955,13 +951,6 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_uart_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
if ((ucr4 & UCR4_OREN) == 0)
usr2 &= ~USR2_ORE;
- if (usr1 & (USR1_RRDY | USR1_AGTIM)) {
- imx_uart_writel(sport, USR1_AGTIM, USR1);
-
- __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id);
- ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
- }
-
if ((usr1 & USR1_TRDY) || (usr2 & USR2_TXDC)) {
imx_uart_transmit_buffer(sport);
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;@@ -991,8 +980,17 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_uart_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+ if (usr1 & (USR1_RRDY | USR1_AGTIM)) {
+ imx_uart_writel(sport, USR1_AGTIM, USR1);
+
+ __imx_uart_rxint(irq, dev_id);
+ ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
spin_unlock(&sport->port.lock);
+out:
return ret;
}
@@ -1977,9 +1975,7 @@ imx_uart_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s, unsigned int count) unsigned int ucr1; int locked = 1; - if (sport->port.sysrq) - locked = 0; - else if (oops_in_progress) + if (oops_in_progress) locked = spin_trylock_irqsave(&sport->port.lock, flags); else spin_lock_irqsave(&sport->port.lock, flags);