Hi Greg,

On Mar 23, 2021, at 2:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:42:09PM -0800, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:

quoted

+static struct cortina_uart_port *cortina_uart_ports;

Why is this not a per-device pointer?

quoted

+static void __exit cortina_uart_exit(void)
+{
+	platform_driver_unregister(&serial_cortina_driver);
+	uart_unregister_driver(&cortina_uart_driver);
+	kfree(cortina_uart_ports);

Should not need to free this here, it should be tied to the device, not
the driver.

Would it be possible to provide a reference to an example 
of a good way to do it.

quoted

+}
+
+module_init(cortina_uart_init);
+module_exit(cortina_uart_exit);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Cortina-Access Inc.");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION(" Cortina-Access UART driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
index 62c2204..1931892 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial_core.h

@@ -277,4 +277,7 @@

/* Freescale LINFlexD UART */
#define PORT_LINFLEXUART	122

+/* Cortina-Access UART */
+#define PORT_CORTINA_ACCESS	123

Also, no need for this, right?  I would prefer to not add new ids if at
all possible.

Could you explain why these are no longer required and what has 
been done in the tty design to make this obsolete?

thanks,

greg k-h