On 06/03/2021 01.20, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

I am just splitting an
existing function into two, where one takes the lock and the other does
the work. Do you mean using a different locking function? I'm not
entirely sure what you're suggesting.

Yes, as a prerequisite

spin_lock_irqsave -> spin_lock().

Krzysztof, is this something you want in this series? I was trying to 
avoid logic changes to the non-Apple paths.

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub