Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2021-01-05

Re: [PATCH 27/31] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: convert to use devm_pm_opp_* API

From: Chanwoo Choi <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-05 04:02:25
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, linux-media, linux-mmc, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, linux-spi, linux-tegra, lkml

Hi,

Do you make this patch on latest source?
When I apply this patch for test, it make the merge conflict error.

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:57 PM Yangtao Li [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use devm_pm_opp_* API to simplify code. Since devres release
can guarantee the order, let's remove
devm_devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier().

Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 22 +++-------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
index 2e912166a993..9b8ab8be29d1 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         * We add a devfreq driver to our parent since it has a device tree node
         * with operating points.
         */
-       if (dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev)) {
+       if (devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev)) {
                dev_err(dev, "Invalid operating-points in device tree.\n");
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto err_edev;
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, &data->rate, 0);
        if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
                ret = PTR_ERR(opp);
-               goto err_free_opp;
+               goto err_edev;
        }

        data->rate = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp);
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                                           &data->ondemand_data);
        if (IS_ERR(data->devfreq)) {
                ret = PTR_ERR(data->devfreq);
-               goto err_free_opp;
+               goto err_edev;
        }

        devm_devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
@@ -473,27 +473,12 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        return 0;

-err_free_opp:
-       dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(&pdev->dev);
 err_edev:
        devfreq_event_disable_edev(data->edev);

        return ret;
 }

-static int rk3399_dmcfreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
-       struct rk3399_dmcfreq *dmcfreq = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
-
-       /*
-        * Before remove the opp table we need to unregister the opp notifier.
-        */
-       devm_devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dmcfreq->dev, dmcfreq->devfreq);
-       dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dmcfreq->dev);
As the comment, we need to unregister the opp notifier before removing the OPP.
Do you guarantee this sequence on your patch?

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-
-       return 0;
-}
-
 static const struct of_device_id rk3399dmc_devfreq_of_match[] = {
        { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dmc" },
        { },
@@ -502,7 +487,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk3399dmc_devfreq_of_match);

 static struct platform_driver rk3399_dmcfreq_driver = {
        .probe  = rk3399_dmcfreq_probe,
-       .remove = rk3399_dmcfreq_remove,
        .driver = {
                .name   = "rk3399-dmc-freq",
                .pm     = &rk3399_dmcfreq_pm,
--
2.25.1

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help