Re: [PATCH] serial: sh-sci: Make sure status register SCxSR is read in correct sequence
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2020-08-14 15:25:39
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc, linux-sh, lkml
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:24 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:28 PM Lad, Prabhakar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:43 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:58 PM Prabhakar Mahadev Lad [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:17 PM Kazuhiro Fujita [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
For SCIF and HSCIF interfaces the SCxSR register holds the status of data that is to be read next from SCxRDR register, But where as for SCIFA and SCIFB interfaces SCxSR register holds status of data that is previously read from SCxRDR register. This patch makes sure the status register is read depending on the port types so that errors are caught accordingly. Cc: <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Fujita <redacted> Signed-off-by: Hao Bui <redacted> Signed-off-by: KAZUMI HARADA <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>quoted
quoted
Nevertheless, this patch will need some testing on various hardware. Do you have a test case to verify the broken/fixed behavior?Agreed, its been tested on RZ/G2x & RZ/G1x by doing a loopback test, configure one interface as CS8 mode(8-bits data, No parity) and other as CS7 mode (7-bits data, 1-bit Parity) and parity errors should be detected.This can easily be tested on the console. Basic testing can even be done with an unmodified kernel, as there is already a "parity error" notice message in the driver. Enable even parity on the console: $ stty evenp (use "oddp" for odd parity, and invert all below) Typing e.g. a single "p" should trigger a parity error. Typing "o" shouldn't. Without this patch, no parity error is detected on SCIF. Likewise, pasting a sequence of "p" characters should trigger a lot of parity errors, "o" shouldn't. Without this patch, parity errors are detected on SCIF, except for the first character. For more advanced testing, make the following change to the driver: - dev_notice(port->dev, "parity error\n"); + dev_notice(port->dev, "parity error for char 0x%02x hweight %u\n", c, hweight8(c)); Pasting an alternating sequence of "p" and "o" characters should trigger parity errors for the "p" characters. Without this patch, they are triggered for the "o" characters instead.Thank you that makes life easier.quoted
With this patch, the issues above are fixed on SCIF. This has been verified on: 1. SCIF on R-Car Gen 2, 2. SCIF on R-Car Gen3 3. SCIF on RZ/A1H, 4. SCIF on RZ/A2M.quoted
If I disable DMA for HSCIF1 in the .dtsi, parity errors are detected as expected.So HSCIF on R-Car Gen3 is affected, and fixed by this patch.quoted
Hence the driver does not support parity checking when DMA is enabled. I also think it's not easy to add support for that, if possible at all.quoted
quoted
I haven't tested it yet on: 1. SCIFB on SH/R-Mobile (needs wiring up),SCIFB on R-Mobile A1 is not affected, and works before/after, as expected.quoted
quoted
quoted
2. SCIFA, SCIFB, and HSCIF on R-Car Gen2 (needs wiring up),Same for SCIFA, SCIFB on R-Car M2-W. HSCIF on R-Car M2-W is affected, and fixed by this patch. This means the modern platforms we care about are handled fine, so Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> That leaves us with testing on a few legacy platforms...quoted
quoted
quoted
3. (H)SCIF on R-Car Gen1 (remote boards unaccessible at the moment), 4. SuperH (only remote Migo-R available, but unaccessible). I can test 1 and 2 (and perhaps 3 and 4) later, if needed.probably testing this on SuperH is gonna be a pain due to lack of hardware availability, (it needs to be tested on 19 platforms) how about #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS || CONFIG_H8300 and the fix ?I had a look at a few SuperH docs w.r.t. framing/parity error behavior: - SCIF(A) on SH7724: similar to R-Car Gen2, - H(SCIF) on SH7734: same as on R-Car Gen2, - SCIF on SH7751: conflict between status register ("to be read next") and flowchart ("read from").
FTR, I gave it a try on the SH7751R-based I-O DATA USL-5P aka Landisk:
SCIF is affected, and fixed by commit 3dc4db3662366306 ("serial: sh-sci:
Make sure status register SCxSR is read in correct sequence").
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds