Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-08-26

Re: spin_lock instead of spin_lock_irqsave in imx uart interuput

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2018-08-26 17:04:39
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:00:42AM -0700, QIANJUN wrote:
spin_lock instead of spin_lock_irqsave in imx uart interuput
What does that mean?
quoted
From 6580790d7be51a78d1376b90df49b04019a1f944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jun qian <redacted>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 06:58:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] before the programe into the uart interuput's handler, the
 system has already disabled the local cpu interuput. so the spin_lock
 interface is More suitable for here.
Why is this here?  The changelog text belongs in the changelog, not in
the subject line :(

can you fix this all up and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help