Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] ARM64 LPC: Add missing range exception for special ISA
From: liviu.dudau-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-09 16:50:50
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:16:17PM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
Hi Liviu Thanks for reviewing
[removed some irrelevant part of discussion, avoid crazy formatting]
quoted
quoted
+/** + * addr_is_indirect_io - check whether the input taddr is forindirectIO.quoted
+ * @taddr: the io address to be checked. + * + * Returns 1 when taddr is in the range; otherwise return 0. + */ +int addr_is_indirect_io(u64 taddr) +{ + if (arm64_extio_ops->start > taddr || arm64_extio_ops->end <taddr) start >= taddr ?Nope... if (taddr < arm64_extio_ops->start || taddr > arm64_extio_ops->end) then taddr is outside the range [start; end] and will return 0; otherwise it will return 1...
Oops, sorry, did not pay attention to the returned value. The check is correct as it is, no need to change then.
quoted
quoted
+ return 0; + + return 1; +} BUILD_EXTIO(b, u8)diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c index 02b2903..cc2a05d 100644 --- a/drivers/of/address.c +++ b/drivers/of/address.c@@ -479,6 +479,50 @@ static int of_empty_ranges_quirk(structdevice_node *np)quoted
return false; } + +/* + * of_isa_indirect_io - get the IO address from some isa regproperty value.quoted
+ * For some isa/lpc devices, no ranges property in ancestor node. + * The device addresses are described directly in their regsproperty.quoted
+ * This fixup function will be called to get the IO address ofisa/lpcquoted
+ * devices when the normal of_translation failed. + * + * @parent: points to the parent dts node; + * @bus: points to the of_bus which can be used to parseaddress;quoted
+ * @addr: the address from reg property; + * @na: the address cell counter of @addr; + * @presult: store the address paresed from @addr; + * + * return 1 when successfully get the I/O address; + * 0 will return for some failures.Bah, you are returning a signed int, why 0 for failure? Return a negative value with error codes. Otherwise change the return value into a bool.Yes we'll move to boolquoted
quoted
+ */ +static int of_get_isa_indirect_io(struct device_node *parent, + struct of_bus *bus, __be32 *addr, + int na, u64 *presult) +{ + unsigned int flags; + unsigned int rlen; + + /* whether support indirectIO */ + if (!indirect_io_enabled()) + return 0; + + if (!of_bus_isa_match(parent)) + return 0; + + flags = bus->get_flags(addr); + if (!(flags & IORESOURCE_IO)) + return 0; + + /* there is ranges property, apply the normal translationdirectly. */ s/there is ranges/if we have a 'ranges'/Thanks for spotting thisquoted
quoted
+ if (of_get_property(parent, "ranges", &rlen)) + return 0; + + *presult = of_read_number(addr + 1, na - 1); + /* this fixup is only valid for specific I/O range. */ + return addr_is_indirect_io(*presult); +} + static int of_translate_one(struct device_node *parent, structof_bus *bus,quoted
struct of_bus *pbus, __be32 *addr, int na, int ns, int pna, const char *rprop)@@ -595,6 +639,15 @@ static u64 __of_translate_address(structdevice_node *dev,quoted
result = of_read_number(addr, na); break; } + /* + * For indirectIO device which has no ranges property, get + * the address from reg directly. + */ + if (of_get_isa_indirect_io(dev, bus, addr, na, &result)) { + pr_debug("isa indirectIO matched(%s)..addr =0x%llx\n",quoted
+ of_node_full_name(dev), result); + break; + } /* Get new parent bus and counts */ pbus = of_match_bus(parent);@@ -688,8 +741,9 @@ static int __of_address_to_resource(structdevice_node *dev,quoted
if (taddr == OF_BAD_ADDR) return -EINVAL; memset(r, 0, sizeof(struct resource)); - if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO) { + if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO && taddr >= PCIBIOS_MIN_IO) { unsigned long port; + port = pci_address_to_pio(taddr); if (port == (unsigned long)-1) return -EINVAL;diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index ba34907..1a08511 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c@@ -3263,7 +3263,7 @@ int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_taddr, resource_size_t size)quoted
#ifdef PCI_IOBASE struct io_range *range; - resource_size_t allocated_size = 0; + resource_size_t allocated_size = PCIBIOS_MIN_IO; /* check if the range hasn't been previously recorded */ spin_lock(&io_range_lock);@@ -3312,7 +3312,7 @@ phys_addr_t pci_pio_to_address(unsigned longpio)quoted
#ifdef PCI_IOBASE struct io_range *range; - resource_size_t allocated_size = 0; + resource_size_t allocated_size = PCIBIOS_MIN_IO;Have you checked that pci_pio_to_address still returns valid values after this? I know that you are trying to take into account PCIBIOS_MIN_IO limit when allocating reserving the IO ranges, but the values added in the io_range_list are still starting from zero, no from PCIBIOS_MIN_IO,I think you're wrong here as in pci_address_to_pio we have: + resource_size_t offset = PCIBIOS_MIN_IO; This should be enough to guarantee that the PIOs start at PCIBIOS_MIN_IO...right?
I don't think you can guarantee that the pio value that gets passed into pci_pio_to_address() always comes from a previously returned value by pci_address_to_pio(). Maybe you can add a check in pci_pio_to_address() if (pio < PCIBIOS_MIN_IO) return address; to avoid adding more checks in the list_for_each_entry() loop. Best regards, Liviu
quoted
so the calculation of the address in this function could return negative values casted to pci_addr_t. Maybe you want to adjust the range->start value in pci_register_io_range() as well to have it offset by PCIBIOS_MIN_IO as well. Best regards, Liviuquoted
if (pio > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) return address;@@ -3335,7 +3335,7 @@ unsigned long __weakpci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)quoted
{ #ifdef PCI_IOBASE struct io_range *res; - resource_size_t offset = 0; + resource_size_t offset = PCIBIOS_MIN_IO; unsigned long addr = -1; spin_lock(&io_range_lock);diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h index 3786473..deec469 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_address.h +++ b/include/linux/of_address.h@@ -24,6 +24,23 @@ struct of_pci_range { #define for_each_of_pci_range(parser, range) \ for (; of_pci_range_parser_one(parser, range);) + +#ifndef indirect_io_enabled +#define indirect_io_enabled indirect_io_enabled +static inline bool indirect_io_enabled(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + +#ifndef addr_is_indirect_io +#define addr_is_indirect_io addr_is_indirect_io +static inline int addr_is_indirect_io(u64 taddr) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + /* Translate a DMA address from device space to CPU space */ extern u64 of_translate_dma_address(struct device_node *dev, const __be32 *in_addr);diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 0e49f70..7f6bbb6 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h@@ -2130,4 +2130,12 @@ static inline bool pci_ari_enabled(structpci_bus *bus)quoted
/* provide the legacy pci_dma_* API */ #include <linux/pci-dma-compat.h> +/* + * define this macro here to refrain from compilation error for some + * platforms. Please keep this macro at the end of this header file. + */ +#ifndef PCIBIOS_MIN_IO +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0 +#endif + #endif /* LINUX_PCI_H */ -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci"inquoted
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html