Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-24

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] serial: 8250_dw: Use new dev variable in probe

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-08-24 10:01:21
Also in: linux-acpi

On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 16:20 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
On 2016/8/22 19:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:01 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
quoted
Use new dev variable instead of pdev->dev and p->dev in probe
function.
I'm not sure we need this one. What is wrong with &pdev->dev?
Yes, no error in current code. there are &pdev->dev(A) and p->dev(B),
some codes use A, others use B, so I want to use an unified one.

If someone don't like this, I will drop it, :)
I want to say that this change doesn't belong to the series in this
case. You may submit it separately later on.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]
Intel Finland Oy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help